SaysockRFQ
Korean custom socks manufacturingProduction-ready RFQ programs for importers, distributors, and retail-ready buyers
Buyer-ready production reviewRequest quote

Attachment guidance

Prepare one clean attachment pack instead of reopening the whole brief.

Use this page only when artwork, references, packaging examples, documentation notes, or shipment-facing files clarify an RFQ that is being prepared or already submitted. If the product, quantity, destination, and packaging frame are already clear, the RFQ can move without extra files.

Primary useOptional file support
Best fitChanged or missing support files
Main outputsOne note, current files, clear lane
RFQ not sent yetSend the RFQ when the commercial frame is ready.

Files can help, but product, quantity, destination, and packaging are enough to start the request.

RFQ already submittedKeep the existing buyer thread.

Send only the changed files and one short note so the review continues from the same commercial frame.

Optional support page

Use this only when a file, reference, or short note changes the production review. If nothing changes product, packaging, documentation, destination, or timing, keep the RFQ moving without another file task.

Attachment handoffSend only the files that help the next reply move forward
Attachment lanes for artwork, packaging, documentation, and shipment notes
One grouped attachment pack beats five scattered file emails.
Production brief pack showing grouped product, quantity, packaging, destination, and timeline inputs

Keep packaging, documentation, and reference files attached to the same product path.

A clean attachment pack should support the existing brief, not force the production team to sort through old assets, mixed refs, and unrelated pack-out ideas.

If files are needed, use one small pack with one short summary note.

The goal is to help the next production reply find the right file, understand why it matters, and keep the project inside the same commercial direction that was already submitted.

  • Skip extra files when the RFQ already explains the product, quantity band, destination, packaging, and timing clearly.
  • Group only the files that support the same product, quantity band, and destination path already in the RFQ.
  • State what each file is supposed to solve: artwork, color direction, packaging format, compliance request, or shipment context.
  • Use simple naming so the next reply can understand the attachment pack without opening every file first.
  • Keep duplicate logos, old concepts, and unrelated channel examples out of the same attachment pack.
  • Add one short summary note explaining what changed since the RFQ instead of rewriting the entire brief.

What this page fixes

A cleaner attachment handoff reduces the most common file-review loop.

What a strong attachment pack looks like

One attachment group, one summary note, and one clear reason each file exists. The buyer should help the next reply move forward, not ask the factory to sort through mixed versions.

What can stay outside the file pack

Anything that does not change product direction, pack-out logic, documentation scope, or shipment assumptions can usually wait until the next focused review stage.

What causes the most file-review drag

Mixed logo versions, no file naming logic, and references with no note about what should actually carry into the sock program usually create another clarification loop.

Attachment lanes

Keep different file types in separate lanes so the next reply can route them correctly.

Artwork and reference files

Keep marks, placements, and reference links in one lane so proof direction does not get buried inside unrelated attachments.

  • One preferred logo file set
  • Placement note or annotated reference
  • Only the product references that still matter

Packaging and commercial support files

Wraps, sleeves, carton ideas, barcode notes, and retail examples should stay together when they influence pack-out or launch readiness.

  • Preferred wrap, sleeve, or box direction
  • Retail-facing label or barcode notes
  • Any shelf-ready or gifting references that should carry over

Documentation and shipment context

Importer, standards, carton, or destination files should stay separate from artwork so the next reply can route them correctly.

  • Named documentation or standards request
  • Destination or importer note
  • Shipment or carton assumptions that changed after the RFQ

Example file packs

Use examples only when a file pack will clarify the buyer problem.

Private-label shelf-ready attachment pack

Use this when the RFQ is already in and the team still needs to add cleaner retail-facing artwork, packaging, and barcode support files.

  • One preferred logo file plus one placement reference
  • Front-of-pack wrap or sleeve reference
  • Barcode or label-content note if retail carryover matters

Promotional run attachment pack

Use this when the product direction is clear but the team still needs to send simpler branded references, gift-kit pack-out examples, or revised timing notes.

  • One logo mark and one campaign color note
  • Simple wrap, insert, or kit-example reference
  • Short note on deadline changes or destination pressure

Compliance-sensitive attachment pack

Use this when the core brief is already in but destination, importer, or document context still needs to be attached clearly.

  • Named standards or importer request
  • Destination or retailer context note
  • Any file proving which product family the request applies to

Summary note templates

Send one short note that explains what changed and what should be used first.

What changed since the RFQ

Since the RFQ, we narrowed the preferred logo file, confirmed the packaging direction, and attached the retail-facing references that should carry into the first proof review.

What the factory should use first

Please use the attached primary logo file, packaging reference, and destination note as the current working set for the next production reply. Older concepts should be ignored unless we call them back in later.

What still stays flexible

Fine artwork scale and minor insert details can still tighten later. The core product family, quantity band, destination, and packaging path should remain the same as the original RFQ.

Naming rules

Simple naming is enough if it tells the next reply what is primary and why.

  • Use one clear project stem such as `brand_program_type_date` across all files.
  • Separate artwork, pack-out, document, and shipment files into distinct names instead of versioning everything as one mixed folder.
  • Mark the preferred working file with `primary` or `current` so the next reply does not guess which file should lead.
  • Avoid sending old concepts, duplicate exports, or screenshots with no note about why they still matter.

Sample filenames

Use names that tell the next reply what is current, what category it belongs to, and why it matters.

Private-label retail pack

  • brand_private-label_logo_primary.ai
  • brand_private-label_packout_reference.pdf
  • brand_private-label_barcode_note.txt

Use when the next reply needs the preferred mark, retail packaging reference, and label or barcode context in one place.

Promotional campaign pack

  • brand_promo_logo_current.svg
  • brand_promo_color_direction.jpg
  • brand_promo_delivery_update.txt

Use when the team needs a cleaner campaign mark, color direction, and timing note without reopening the product brief.

Documentation request pack

  • brand_docs_importer_request.pdf
  • brand_docs_destination_note.txt
  • brand_docs_product-scope_reference.pdf

Use when the document request is tied to a destination, importer, retailer, or product-family scope.

Do not send

Leave out anything that makes the next reply sort, guess, or restart the brief.

Every historical logo export

Send the preferred working mark and one fallback only if needed. A full brand archive makes the next proof path slower.

Inspiration images with no carryover note

References only help when the note says what should carry into the sock, packaging, or color system.

Mixed compliance requests with no destination

Certification or audit files need market, importer, or retailer context before they can support a useful production reply.

Related routes

Open the next prep surface only if the attachment pack still points to a deeper blocker.

Artwork prep

Open artwork prep if the main problem is still logo files, placement notes, or proof-direction cleanup rather than the attachment pack itself.

Open artwork prep

Packaging prep

Open packaging prep if the attachments are really about wraps, labels, cartons, or shelf-ready presentation decisions.

Open packaging prep

Documentation prep

Open documentation prep if the attachments are blocked by standards, audit context, or importer-facing proof requests.

Open documentation prep

Quote prep

Open quote prep if the attachment pack is ready but quantity, timing, destination, or the commercial frame still needs tightening.

Open quote prep

Send production RFQ

Use the RFQ when the product, quantity, destination, and packaging frame are ready. Files can be added only if they clarify the review.

Send production RFQ

Ready to turn the file pack into a production request?

Use the RFQ when the commercial frame is ready. Files can be added only if they clarify the review.